2009-03-25

Men's College Basketball Ratings after Sweet 16

2009-03-14

2008-2009 Mens College Basketball Ratings

2008-10-07

2008 Week 7 Top Offense, Top Defense, Top Strength of Schedule

Leading Offenses of Division 1


RankTeamOffRtgAvgPF
1.Clev. St. Ignatius55.536.4
2.Mentor54.030.7
3.Lakewood St. Edward52.734.3
4.Middletown50.040.3
5.Cin. Elder48.933.7
6.Findlay48.633.4
7.Pickerington Cen.48.434.7
8.Willoughby South46.431.3
9.Cin. Colerain44.132.0
10.Cin. Sycamore43.033.1


Leading Defenses of Division 1


RankTeamDefRtgAvgPA
1.Dublin Coffman3.33.3
2.Clev. Glenville3.66.0
3.Hilliard Davidson3.85.4
4.Clev. St. Ignatius4.09.3
5.Pickerington Cen.4.15.9
6.Kettering Fairmont5.18.7
7.Hamilton5.411.0
8.West Chester Lakota West5.812.1
9.Cols. Brookhaven6.38.7
10.Euclid6.315.9


Toughest Schedules of Division 1


RankTeam
1.Cin. St. Xavier
2.Clev. St. Ignatius
3.Cin. La Salle
4.Cin. Arch. Moeller
5.Cin. Elder
6.Cin. Princeton
7.Liberty Township Lakota East
8.Mentor
9.Cin. Colerain
10.North Canton Hoover


Leading Offenses of Division 2


RankTeamOffRtgAvgPF
1.Cin. Anderson52.239.4
2.Louisville43.737.7
3.Cols. St. Francis DeSales43.629.1
4.Cin. Winton Woods42.331.0
5.Lexington40.542.6
6.Sylvania Southview39.146.9
7.Parma Padua Franciscan37.831.6
8.Logan37.434.4
9.Cols. Beechcroft37.245.0
10.Whitehouse Anthony Wayne36.633.9


Leading Defenses of Division 2


RankTeamDefRtgAvgPA
1.Mayfield4.37.7
2.Cols. Beechcroft4.34.6
3.Tol. Cen. Cath.4.57.4
4.Cols. St. Francis DeSales4.910.7
5.Louisville5.39.4
6.Sylvania Southview5.57.0
7.Cols. Bish. Watterson6.513.4
8.Warren Howland6.711.6
9.Medina Highland7.47.6
10.Richfield Revere8.611.4


Toughest Schedules of Division 2


RankTeam
1.Uniontown Lake
2.Cols. Bish. Watterson
3.Olmsted Falls
4.Cols. St. Francis DeSales
5.Dublin Scioto
6.Dublin Jerome
7.Vandalia Butler
8.Copley
9.Powell Olentangy Liberty
10.Lewis Center Olentangy


Leading Offenses of Division 3


RankTeamOffRtgAvgPF
1.Dover47.747.9
2.Newark Licking Valley45.342.0
3.Germantown Valley View43.738.0
4.Granville43.436.9
5.Cin. Indian Hill41.041.4
6.Eaton40.934.7
7.Thornville Sheridan40.938.4
8.Canal Fulton Northwest40.132.3
9.Clyde39.238.0
10.Bellevue38.737.3


Leading Defenses of Division 3


RankTeamDefRtgAvgPA
1.New Richmond6.02.7
2.Poland Seminary6.36.1
3.Germantown Valley View6.612.6
4.Canton South6.613.4
5.Cuyahoga Falls Walsh Jesuit6.914.3
6.Chagrin Falls9.311.6
7.Newark Licking Valley9.316.1
8.New Philadelphia9.58.7
9.Canal Winchester9.58.3
10.Dover9.614.6


Toughest Schedules of Division 3


RankTeam
1.Mentor Lake Cath.
2.Cuyahoga Falls Walsh Jesuit
3.Clev. Benedictine
4.Canton South
5.Whitehall Yearling
6.Chardon Notre Dame Cathedral Latin
7.Chillicothe
8.Hunting Valley University School
9.Lisbon Beaver Local
10.Eaton


Leading Offenses of Division 4


RankTeamOffRtgAvgPF
1.Coldwater50.441.3
2.Fostoria42.933.9
3.Youngstown Cardinal Mooney39.733.1
4.Clarksville Clinton Massie38.643.1
5.Perry37.942.6
6.Genoa Area37.445.9
7.Hamilton Badin37.126.1
8.Dayton Oakwood36.528.9
9.Brookville35.141.1
10.Steubenville35.037.3


Leading Defenses of Division 4


RankTeamDefRtgAvgPA
1.Genoa Area3.33.6
2.Coldwater4.67.6
3.Kettering Arch. Alter5.86.3
4.Plain City Jonathan Alder6.27.4
5.Akron St. Vincent St. Mary6.79.7
6.Marion Pleasant6.97.1
7.Ottawa Glandorf7.011.0
8.Steubenville7.17.7
9.Youngstown Cardinal Mooney7.310.9
10.Pemberville Eastwood7.510.1


Toughest Schedules of Division 4


RankTeam
1.Youngstown Cardinal Mooney
2.West Milton Milton Union
3.Fostoria
4.Akron St. Vincent St. Mary
5.Canton Cen. Cath.
6.Coldwater
7.St. Bernard Roger Bacon
8.Ironton
9.Hamilton Badin
10.Dayton Oakwood


Leading Offenses of Division 5


RankTeamOffRtgAvgPF
1.Youngstown Ursuline44.240.6
2.Maria Stein Marion Local40.438.6
3.Findlay Liberty Benton36.451.9
4.Anna35.935.9
5.Heath33.034.3
6.Baltimore Liberty Union32.335.1
7.Liberty Center32.242.0
8.Wheelersburg31.830.6
9.Cols. Bish. Ready31.625.8
10.West Jefferson31.130.9


Leading Defenses of Division 5


RankTeamDefRtgAvgPA
1.Findlay Liberty Benton3.53.7
2.West Portsmouth Portsmouth West4.64.7
3.Youngstown Ursuline6.49.7
4.West Liberty Salem6.75.3
5.Maria Stein Marion Local7.010.1
6.Minford7.16.7
7.West Jefferson7.310.1
8.Baltimore Liberty Union7.69.0
9.St. Henry7.614.0
10.Delphos Jefferson7.74.7


Toughest Schedules of Division 5


RankTeam
1.Versailles
2.St. Henry
3.Cols. Bish. Ready
4.Youngstown Ursuline
5.Anna
6.Johnstown Monroe
7.Louisville St. Thomas Aquinas
8.Cin. Purcell Marian
9.Montpelier
10.Rockford Parkway


Leading Offenses of Division 6


RankTeamOffRtgAvgPF
1.Norwalk St. Paul47.452.1
2.McDonald39.848.9
3.Mechanicsburg35.642.6
4.McComb34.736.0
5.Bascom Hopewell Loudon34.536.7
6.Hannibal River30.633.0
7.Shadyside30.426.9
8.Mogadore29.937.3
9.Ada29.241.7
10.Malvern28.748.0


Leading Defenses of Division 6


RankTeamDefRtgAvgPA
1.Hannibal River4.53.6
2.Norwalk St. Paul6.25.9
3.Bascom Hopewell Loudon8.09.3
4.Sidney Lehman Cath.11.512.2
5.Carey11.711.9
6.Delphos St. Johns12.014.0
7.Newark Cath.12.214.3
8.Youngstown Christian12.313.6
9.Ada12.39.4
10.Danville13.011.7


Toughest Schedules of Division 6


RankTeam
1.New Bremen
2.Cols. Grove
3.Minster
4.Delphos St. Johns
5.Warren JFK
6.Cols. Harvest Prep
7.Leipsic
8.Vanlue
9.Sandusky St. Mary Cen. Cath.
10.Tiffin Calvert


2008 Wk7 Ratings

2008-09-27

Week 7: Genoa (6-0) @ Eastwood (5-1)

Genoa AreaStatPemberville Eastwood
#10 (D4)Rank--
6-0 (3-0 conf) (2-0 away)Record5-1 (3-0 conf) (3-0 home)
4/14Div/Reg4/14
Suburban LakesConferenceSuburban Lakes
211 (Public)Enrollment232 (Public)
W6StreakW5
69.85Rating62.18
33.5OffRtg31.7
4.6DefRtg6.5
8.60HarbinAvg6.30
54.8RPI49.7
#3 R14Reg Rank#6 R14
49.5AvgPF46.8
4.2AvgPA7.8
+45.3Avg +/-+39.0
SubmitOffensive StyleRun & Shoot
SubmitDefensive Style5-2 Monster
556SoS596
0-0vs top500-0
0-0vs top1000-1
0-0vs top2500-1
0Bad Losses (>250)0
12-20Adjusted Opponents' Record12-20
0-0Close Games0-0
0-0OT Games0-0
0-0vs Playoff Teams0-1
D4:2 D5:4Size of OpponentsD3:2 D4:2 D5:2



Common Opponents:
Week 2 Genoa Area vs Oak Harbor 61-0; Week 3 Pemberville Eastwood at Oak Harbor 28-0
Week 5 Genoa Area at Elmore Woodmore 63-12; Week 6 Pemberville Eastwood at Elmore Woodmore 49-0


Genoa Area: 76.4% chance of winning

For an explanation of the terms and ratings, click here.

2008 Week 6 Conference Rankings

Ohio High School Football Conference Rankings


RankConferenceTeamsPlayoff TeamsStrengthAvgRtgMedRtgAvgRankAvgSoSPlayoff W-LOOC W-LTop Team
1Greater Catholic - South 41 (25.0%)85.585.883.224.35.50-011-7#1 Cin. Elder (5-1)
2Steel Valley32 (66.7%)82.682.383.533.799.70-013-1#8 Youngstown Ursuline (6-0)
3Federal84 (50.0%)74.775.172.673.653.50-018-4#10 North Canton Hoover (5-1)
4Greater Miami 112 (18.2%)73.073.175.7105.462.90-018-17#6 Cin. Colerain (6-0)
5Ohio Capital - Buckeye 63 (50.0%)71.971.965.0115.0109.70-021-11#14 Upper Arlington (5-1)
6Ohio Capital - Cardinal 63 (50.0%)70.770.968.9145.365.00-020-12#5 Pickerington Cen. (6-0)
7Central Catholic53 (60.0%)70.270.967.4125.2138.20-019-7#11 Cols. St. Francis DeSales (6-0)
8Northeastern Buckeye84 (50.0%)68.969.066.4167.9176.10-019-5#4 Louisville (6-0)
9Midwest Athletic 106 (60.0%)64.865.661.3197.0206.80-018-1#7 Coldwater (6-0)
10Suburban83 (37.5%)64.865.163.7169.0161.60-016-8#56 Medina Highland (6-0)
11Southwestern82 (25.0%)64.764.364.7175.0138.00-015-9#92 Amherst Steele (6-0)
12Southwestern Buckeye - SW75 (71.4%)63.964.463.4180.6184.30-018-6#54 Brookville (6-0)
13Ohio Capital - Capital 61 (16.7%)63.863.164.4189.8150.50-016-14#117 Dublin Scioto (2-4)
14Greater Western Ohio 154 (26.7%)62.762.762.8212.4130.70-019-13#20 Clayton Northmont (5-1)
15Lake Erie104 (40.0%)61.762.560.1223.4220.20-024-15#12 Mentor (4-2)
16Ohio Capital - Ohio 60 (0.0%)61.660.962.1229.8113.00-010-20#67 Hilliard Darby (4-2)
17Greater Catholic - North 41 (25.0%)60.961.459.4220.3165.80-010-8#85 Kettering Arch. Alter (4-2)
18Northeast Ohio185 (27.8%)60.761.856.8230.6141.70-022-24#15 Strongsville (5-1)
19Northern Lakes82 (25.0%)60.058.661.8262.1274.40-014-10#37 Sylvania Southview (6-0)
20Fort Ancient Valley 175 (29.4%)59.259.360.2257.4235.50-029-15#25 Cin. Winton Woods (5-1)
21Ohio Capital - Central 61 (16.7%)58.458.354.0260.3106.30-010-22#141 Pickerington North (4-2)
22North Coast102 (20.0%)58.357.358.5280.8251.30-023-25#61 Akron Arch. Hoban (4-2)
23Ohio Cardinal82 (25.0%)57.758.253.5274.0228.50-012-11#27 Lexington (6-0)
24Northern Ohio 84 (50.0%)56.856.854.9290.6258.30-013-11#34 Fostoria (6-0)
25Premier60 (0.0%)56.557.055.2280.7282.70-017-13#100 Willoughby South (4-2)
26Greater Catholic - Central 40 (0.0%)56.456.153.8294.0156.00-05-13#179 Hamilton Badin (3-3)
27East Central Ohio73 (42.9%)56.456.054.5300.4311.00-016-12#51 Dover (5-1)
28Southeastern Ohio 104 (40.0%)56.256.454.1296.4246.10-017-14#32 Logan (6-0)
29Muskingum Valley 92 (22.2%)56.056.553.2296.6285.60-09-5#46 Thornville Sheridan (6-0)
30Independent239 (39.1%)55.956.352.4307.8266.70-059-58#3 Clev. St. Ignatius (5-1)
31Greater Buckeye61 (16.7%)55.154.453.3316.7205.50-011-19#72 Fremont Ross (5-1)
32Mid-State247 (29.2%)55.053.855.2317.2297.80-030-24#59 Newark Licking Valley (5-1)
33Trumbull82 (25.0%)54.853.558.1326.5452.10-024-7#133 Hubbard (5-1)
34Western Buckeye 102 (20.0%)54.353.451.2328.2265.40-03-7#112 St. Marys Memorial (6-0)
35Principals73 (42.9%)53.052.059.6350.0403.00-018-6#150 Cuyahoga Falls CVCA (5-1)
36Akron City Series71 (14.3%)52.953.449.6334.9239.90-09-15#75 Akron Garfield (4-2)
37Toledo City121 (8.3%)52.050.952.3356.2254.70-010-26#31 Tol. Cen. Cath. (6-0)
38Northwest92 (22.2%)51.551.651.6357.1383.20-07-6#118 Ada (6-0)
39Metro81 (12.5%)50.952.241.1354.4228.80-014-26#40 Poland Seminary (6-0)
40Central Buckeye123 (25.0%)50.450.251.3374.4377.80-014-16#70 Tipp City Tippecanoe (6-0)
41Northwest Ohio92 (22.2%)49.549.549.5377.3379.70-07-7#64 Hamler Patrick Henry (6-0)
42Mid-Buckeye83 (37.5%)49.349.144.9389.4389.50-012-12#159 Johnstown Monroe (4-2)
43West Shore81 (12.5%)49.049.249.6393.1372.40-011-13#69 Avon (6-0)
44Mid-Ohio 102 (20.0%)48.848.547.7397.3415.00-02-7#120 Marion Pleasant (5-1)
45Midland82 (25.0%)48.848.647.7388.5471.00-016-8#88 Bascom Hopewell Loudon (6-0)
46Wayne County 83 (37.5%)48.647.946.5404.3468.00-013-11#213 Apple Creek Waynedale (5-1)
47Blanchard Valley103 (30.0%)48.548.246.8395.0412.90-05-5#49 Findlay Liberty Benton (6-0)
48Columbus City164 (25.0%)48.248.541.7388.9389.30-015-15#38 Cols. Brookhaven (5-1)
49Sandusky Bay82 (25.0%)47.548.643.7401.3367.80-010-14#91 Clyde (5-1)
50Suburban Lakes82 (25.0%)47.447.746.6406.8442.60-012-12#101 Genoa Area (6-0)
51Ohio Valley Athletic 269 (34.6%)46.946.845.3415.1432.80-033-28#9 Steubenville (6-0)
52Southwestern Buckeye - BUCK71 (14.3%)46.446.247.8433.7432.60-013-11#224 Waynesville (5-1)
53Chagrin Valley185 (27.8%)46.145.745.0426.1477.30-024-22#123 Aurora (4-2)
54Inter-Tri-County 166 (37.5%)45.943.947.4445.1540.70-023-9#221 McDonald (6-0)
55Green Meadows83 (37.5%)45.544.939.6428.6513.60-014-10#153 Sherwood Fairview (5-1)
56South Central Ohio71 (14.3%)44.545.246.8444.6455.00-09-15#104 Clarksville Clinton Massie (6-0)
57Ohio Heritage83 (37.5%)43.744.438.2448.4548.30-014-10#71 Mechanicsburg (6-0)
58Firelands82 (25.0%)43.743.544.2465.6594.00-015-9#236 Norwalk St. Paul (5-0)
59Miami Valley73 (42.9%)43.342.645.8470.9620.40-016-5#219 Cin. Hills Christian Academy (6-0)
60North Central83 (37.5%)42.442.442.7477.1549.40-012-12#154 Bucyrus Wynford (6-0)
61Cincinnati Metro61 (16.7%)41.743.739.6467.0478.70-09-14#77 Cin. Woodward (6-0)
62Cincinnati Hills81 (12.5%)41.543.336.8471.4448.80-05-18#165 Cin. Indian Hill (4-2)
63Portage Trail164 (25.0%)41.241.639.0479.5472.60-010-27#60 Ravenna (5-1)
64Southern Ohio114 (36.4%)41.141.239.3467.9618.50-028-13#144 Wheelersburg (6-0)
65Southwestern Ohio Public51 (20.0%)40.139.441.6484.8406.80-09-14#173 Dayton Dunbar (5-1)
66Ohio Valley60 (0.0%)39.938.937.8524.7473.80-08-21#399 South Point (3-3)
67Scioto Valley82 (25.0%)38.436.741.1520.1577.00-08-15#294 Williamsport Westfall (4-2)
68Southern Buckeye91 (11.1%)38.037.935.9515.2558.30-05-11#253 New Richmond (6-0)
69Patriot101 (10.0%)37.437.734.3519.2546.10-011-19#181 Lorain Clearview (6-0)
70Senate101 (10.0%)37.241.629.5494.9441.60-07-23#2 Clev. Glenville (6-0)
71Northeastern50 (0.0%)36.336.832.9556.8493.20-05-21#445 Painesville Harvey (2-4)
72Inter-Valley82 (25.0%)34.635.427.5533.4598.40-010-14#254 Malvern (6-0)
73Tri-Valley122 (16.7%)33.933.433.9569.2646.60-019-23#374 Nelsonville York (5-1)
74Cross County101 (10.0%)30.730.828.1594.5671.50-01-9#357 Casstown Miami East (5-1)
75East Suburban70 (0.0%)28.627.831.8637.3676.10-07-17#570 Youngstown Christian (3-2)
76Toledo Area71 (14.3%)27.728.328.1612.1667.60-07-17#342 Northwood (5-1)
77Northwest Central80 (0.0%)24.724.720.2639.3643.00-03-19#511 Waynesfield Goshen (4-2)


Week 7: Dover (5-1) @ Claymont (3-3)

DoverStatUhrichsville Claymont
#6 (D3)Rank--
5-1 (3-0 conf) (2-0 away)Record3-3 (1-2 conf) (2-1 home)
3/11Div/Reg3/11
East Central OhioConferenceEast Central Ohio
302 (Public)Enrollment297 (Public)
W5StreakW0
75.95Rating54.51
49.1OffRtg17.2
12.0DefRtg20.8
10.10HarbinAvg4.00
51.9RPI48.1
#5 R11Reg Rank#14 R11
44.5AvgPF18.3
17.0AvgPA24.5
+27.5Avg +/--6.2
SubmitOffensive StyleSubmit
SubmitDefensive StyleSubmit
209SoS322
0-1vs top500-0
1-1vs top1000-0
2-1vs top2500-3
0Bad Losses (>250)0
19-17Adjusted Opponents' Record23-13
1-0Close Games0-1
0-0OT Games0-0
1-1vs Playoff Teams0-3
D2:1 D3:3 D4:2Size of OpponentsD3:3 D4:3



Common Opponents:
Week 5 Dover vs Coshocton 53-14; Week 6 Uhrichsville Claymont at Coshocton 7-42


Dover: 96.4% chance of winning

For an explanation of the terms and ratings, click here.